HOW WUDE!

This is my July column for Temple City Life, the local news monthly I write for.

HOW WUDE!

One of the least endearing (translation: too much like a Saturday morning cartoon) characters in the Star Wars epic is Jar Jar Binks, who seems a cross between a vaudeville comic and a tall frog. Jar Jar's verbal ticks includes the inability to pronounce words with the letter R. So at one point he protests the bad behavior of another by indignantly saying, “How wude!”

I was thinking about rudeness recently because of an experience I had—setting up our daughter at college in central Florida. We spent several days there in May and one night over dinner I asked her what her impression of Florida was. “A lot like California,” she said. “Only less rude.”

It was undeniable. People smiled and waved more. They waved you through when making a turn. Sales people in stores were more helpful. I wonder why?

Some people would say, well, that's just the way Southerners are. And there's something to that. Some of the nicest people in the world are from the South. But why aren't people from Boston or Minnesota also known as nice? How did that happen?

As I said, I was thinking about this and realized that big urban areas tend to encourage rudeness. Los Angeles County has the same population as Michigan in a fraction of the area. In a densely populated area, the chances of meeting the same person at random is fairly low. So we can indulge our worse nature with a fairly low chance of having to pay for it sometime down the road.

Go to the other extreme: a small town of a few thousand in Kentucky or Idaho. Chronic rudeness gets you a community-wide reputation pretty quickly. There really are few secrets in small towns, and that's a good thing. That kind of transparency encourages us to good behavior.

Bill Cosby likes to remind us that when he was growing up, even in his Philadelphia neighborhood, that if he misbehaved in the street, there was always an adult nearby who could say, “Boy, I know where you like and I know your parents.” That accountability encourages the best from us.

So, sorry to say, I had the same impression my daughter did about Winter Park, Florida. People were just nicer. And it did remind me of California: palm trees, warm weather, and a salsa-flavored population. But they were just nicer.

So how do we import some Florida niceness to Temple City? I have three simple suggestions: look around, be accountable and look up.

By look around, I mean just because we live with so many people and maybe we can get away with rudeness doesn't mean we ought to. The Golden Rule applies despite any population trend. “Treat other people the way you want to be treated” is always applicable.

By be accountable, I mean the fact that a lot of rudeness loses its grip when we have a community that we will have to face. We have a lot of distinct ethnic segments in Temple City, and its easy to hide within our segment and in effect ignore people with limited English skills, or, if we're part of the immigrant community, it's also easy to stick with “our own” and pretty much ignore the native-born people. To both, I say, “How wude!” It's rude to ignore someone—just as rude as being mean or short-tempered.

As a Christian pastor, one of the transforming things I've seen again and again is a person who's led a relatively isolated life who comes into the church. Over the course of months, it's fascinating—and delightful—to watch them change and connect up with others on a level they never dreamed possible. Part of that connection is a discovery of the positive power of accountability.

Finally, look up. There's an old story—from the South, “I reckon”--about a father and son team of thieves. The father decided to make off with some melons at harvest time and posted his ten-year-old as his look-out. When he had his sack full, he asked the boy, “Anyone to the north?” The answer: “No, pa.” “South?” “No, pa.” “East?” “No, pa.” “West?” “No, pa.” “OK” says the dad. “Let's go.” The boy answered, “You forgot one direction. Up. And ma says God sees us.”

Sure, you could get away with being rude. You can get away with a lot—if you only care about the points of the compass. Look up as well. Don't be “wude”; nice never hurt anybody, did it?

It Wasn't Falwell. It Was Francis Schaeffer

From The Huffington Post to The Weekly Standard, articles have appeared (some downright evil, some irenic) about the legacy of the late Jerry Falwell and his impact on the American scene--especially on the electorate.

First, a disclaimer: Falwell and I weren't on the same page when it came to separatism, eschatology and charisma. But he was far more than the cardboard cut-out that he's been made out to be. His faith was real, deep and strong. He had a passion for the lost and a special place in his heart for alcoholics. Very early on, Thomas Road Baptist established a home for alcoholic men.

But it wasn't Jerry Falwell who established the movement that the Moral Majority expressed. It was Francis Schaeffer. It was Schaeffer's writings and films (How Then Shall We Live? [1976] and Whatever Happened to the Human Race? [1980]) which inspired a generation of students and believers to re-engage in the political process.

Falwell's strain of social involvement was rooted in early 20th century fundamentalist pietism which regarded socio-political engagement as useless at best and harmful to the gospel at worse. Schaeffer's background was in the Reformed tradition which emphasized, in the tradition of William Wilberforce and Abraham Kuyper, the supremacy of Christ over all areas of life.

Falwell's success in mobilizing millions of American believers to engage in the social and political issues of the 1980s and beyond was inconceivable apart from Schaeffer--who died in twenty-three years ago, in 1984.

The Week They Lost It

The past week may be noted as The Week They Lost It, as in lost control of their words. Who are they?

First nominee is Christopher Hitchens who lost it commenting on the death of Jerry Falwell. (see YouTube video below:)




His comments are utterly indefensible even for his point of view. He lost it.

Second, if accounts are to be trusted, Sen John McCain lost it when confronted on the McCain-Kennedy Immigration bill, hurling unprintable words at some fellow-senators dissented from the bill. His pursuit of the presidency is over.


Third, former President Jimmy Carter lost it. He called the Bush Administration "the worst in history."

The Carter-Clinton effort to bring Baptists together for a image-scrubbing event in early 2008 seems more and more incredulous and more and more politically motivated.

Secure Your Homeland!

Ask people what concerns them most on day-to-day; it’s not global terrorism, the economy or the price of gasoline. It’s their marriage and family. In our bones we feel that home should be a sanctuary, a place of peace. At the same time, I imagine most readers of this column could count on two hands the number of people they know where marriage eating them alive and home is chaos. And maybe YOU’RE on that list.

So what’s to be done? Are there “winning strategies” that can be applied to secure the home front? Over the last several months, I’ve been working with two men I greatly admire on something we call HOMELAND SECURITY. (I seem to recall that there’s a government agency with the same name!) We’re putting on a three-night seminar deigned to enable YOU to secure your own personal homeland with timeless and timely strategies that WORK.

Did you know that the average American marriage starting out today has about 41-43% chance of ending in divorce? But research reveals that committed Christian couples—those who regularly attend church and apply themselves to their faith—divorce at a rate 35% lower than “secular” couples (that is, they profess no adherence to any faith)! Clearly, there’s something different. There are life principles that change outcomes! Now here’s a stunning statistic: nominal Christians, who seldom or never attend church but who profess faith, actually have slightly higher divorce rates than “secular” couples!

The seminar is from June 10-12. June 10 from 6-8 PM, I will lead session one. I’ll start with “Biblical Foundations of Marriage.” This is a study into the God-designed origins of marriage that will fascinate and surprise you, and give you a whole new view of marriage. In the second hour, we’ll build on that in “Don’t Survive, Thrive! Making Marriage Work.” I guarantee that you’ll hear some of the most practical things you’ve ever heard on marriage. We’ll spend of lot of time on the God-designed differences in men and women, how husband and wife are designed to complete the inner needs of the other and other great keys like The Tingle Principle.

On Monday and Tuesday nights, June 11 and 12, we welcome two great expert guests. Since those are work nights, the schedule shifts to 7 to 9 PM. On Monday we have Steve Robbins of RobbinsNest Ministries. How do children develop a heart that loves God? Steve will lead us in “The Spiritual Formation of Children.” Last year Steve has published his first book, Transforming Beliefs and is working on a new book about the Sermon on the Mount. He will share his insights as a dad and as a director of a ministry that specializes in deepening people’s experience of God. I’ve been fascinated to hear how Steve and his wife Ruth Ann have worked to form a heart for God in the lives of their children. If you’re a parent or a grandparent or if you work with children, you won’t want to miss this.

On Tuesday night, we welcome Richard Rupp. Rick is a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist and a frequent speaker at men's conferences and retreats. He has also taught on Men's Issues as an adjunct professor at Fuller Graduate School of Psychology. He is co-author of a new book, What Wives Wish their Husbands Knew about Sex: A Guide for Christian Men. Rick’s specialty is gender identity. In a world in which gender identity is confusing and chaotic, Rick brings sanity back into focus. He’ll be speaking on “Raising Your Sons to be Men and Your Daughters to be Women.” Remember that on Monday and Tuesday nights, we’ll go from 7 to 9 PM.

This all takes place on the campus of First Baptist Church in Temple City, June 10-12. You can register by calling (626) 286-3125 or by email at glenn@templecitybaptist.org. All you have to do is register. This is so important that we’re not charging for this seminar. We want as many people as possible to come and benefit from this. I’ll see you there!

More on Herod's Tomb

Ehud Netzer displays one of the finds from Herod’s tomb. Photo by Ulrich Sahm.

Adapted from the BAR website, read more about the Herod tomb discovery:

Herod Tomb Update

May 10, 2007

“Ehud Netzer is 100 per cent certain he’s found King Herod’s tomb,” BAR editor Hershel Shanks told us from Jerusalem. He was among the first reporters to visit Herodium with excavator Ehud Netzer the day after Netzer announced that he had located the tomb inside the northeast slope of the volcano-shaped site. Netzer, of Hebrew University, first began his excavations at Herodium 35 years ago.

Located about 8 miles south of Jerusalem, Herodium is a striking structure built by Herod to house a fortress and palaces. At the base of the mountain, Herod built a small city, called Lower Herodium, and many scholars had believed that his tomb was somewhere at the base. Others, Shanks told us, had suggested that Herod’s tomb was in one of the towers at the top of the mountain, the only one of the four towers that had been sealed off in ancient times.

“The tomb is quite far down the slope,” Shanks said. From the base, a processional course featuring fancy architecture leads up the slope. Netzer and his team found a 10-meter-square (about 32 by 32 feet) podium. “Netzer hypothesizes that the podium supported a mausoleum,” Shanks continued, adding that Netzer had found fragments of both the mausoleum and a sarcophagus that had been inside it. “The sarcophagus was vengefully destroyed about 70 years after Herod’s death by members of the First Jewish Revolt against Rome” according to Netzer, Shanks said.

Netzer recognizes that because he did not find an inscription with Herod’s name not all scholars will accept his conclusion that this is indeed the tomb of ancient Judea’s at-times mad king. Netzer had hoped to publish a technical article on his findings, but when he realized that the story would soon come out in the media, he decided to hold a press conference to lay out his finds and his conclusions.

Shanks noted that when Netzer does publish his scientific article, some scholars may take issue with his conclusions. But Shanks gives great weight to Netzer’s theory. “Ehud Netzer has been living with Herod the Great for 50 years, so he feels the man. He also brings an architect’s eye to his work,” Shanks said. “If anyone understands Herod, it’s Ehud Netzer.”

Since our news account about the find (see below), Hebrew University has posted two reports on the web; they can be found here: http://www.hunews.huji.ac.il/articles.asp?cat=6&artID=773 and here:

http://archaeology.huji.ac.il/news/newfound.asp

Some very nice pictures of Professor Netzer and the site can be viewed here.The German publication Spiegel also has some very good photos at:

http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/0,5538,21444,00.html

And less than a day after the announcement of the find, the possible political ramifications for Israeli-Palestinian conflict entered into the picture: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/08/AR2007050800280.html

Herod’s Tomb Found

May 8, 2007

Thirty-five years after he first began excavating the site of Herodium, archaeologist Ehud Netzer, of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, has finally found what he’s been looking for—the tomb of Herod the Great, the murderous king who ruled Judea on behalf of Rome from 37 to 4 B.C.

The tomb turned out to be on the northeast slope of the manmade, volcano-shaped mountain of Herodium, about 8 miles south of Jerusalem. The builder of many grand projects throughout his kingdom—Caesarea, Masada, the expanded Temple Mount in Jerusalem—Herod constructed Herodium on a vast scale, with complexes inside the mountain and also a small city at the base, called Lower Herodium.

Herod seems to have originally intended his tomb to be inside a mausoleum in Lower Herodium but changed his mind later life and decided to be interred inside the mountain itself. At the top of the mountain Herod had built a fortress, a mountain and a monument; the tomb itself was approached by a monumental staircase about 21-feet wide.

Herod’s ornate sarcophagus, however, had been smashed in ancient times, likely by participants of the First Jewish Revolt against Rome (67-70 A.D.)—a reflection of how widely hated Herod was by his subjects, who saw him as a cruel puppet of Rome.

BAR published an extensive overview of Herodium by Netzer himself; click here to read it.

To see Hebrew University’s announcement of the discovery, click here.

A press report from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz can be read at http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/856808.html.

A selection of photos can be found at Yahoo.

Ha'aretz Reports on Herodion Discovery

More on what I reported earlier. I have always seen this spelled Herodion, Ha'Aretz spells it Herodium, let's call the whole thing off. (Lame Cole Porter reference.)

Hebrew University: Herod's tomb and grave found at Herodium

By Amiram Barkat, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Staff

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem announced Monday night that it has uncovered the grave and tomb of King Herod, who ruled Judea for the Roman empire from circa 37 BCE. According to a press release from the Hebrew University, the news of the archeological find at Herodium was to be announced Tuesday morning at a special news conference, and was to be kept secret until then, but the discovery by Haaretz of the story had led to the premature announcement.

The tomb was discovered by Hebrew University Professor Ehud Netzer, who is considered one of the leading experts on King Herod. Netzer has conducted archeological digs at Herodium since 1972 in an attempt to locate the grave and tomb.

The discovery solves one of Israel's greatest archeological mysteries. Additional details will be made available at the Tuesday press conference. The majority of researchers had believed that Herod was in fact buried at Herodium, based on the writings of the ancient Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, but multiple excavations at the site failed to locate the grave.

Netzer's successful dig focused on a different part of the site than previous excavations, between the upper part of Herodium and the site's two palaces.

Herodium, a fortified palace built by Herod some 12 kilometers south of Jerusalem, was destroyed by the Romans in 71 CE. Herod, whose father and grandfather converted to Judaism, was appointed governor of Galilee at the age of 25 and was made "King of the Jews" by the Roman senate in approximately 40 BCE. He remained king for around 34 years.

Herod, also known as Herod the Great, is credited with expanding the Second Temple and building Caesarea, Masada, and many other monumental construction projects. He died in the year 4 BCE in Jericho after a long illness.

Herod decided to construct his tomb at Herodium because the site played a role in two dramatic events in his life. In the year 43 BCE, when Herod was still governor of the Galilee, he was forced to flee Jerusalem along with his family after his enemies the Parthians laid siege to the city. His mother's chariot flipped over near Herodium, and Herod became hysterical until he realized she was only lightly wounded. A short while later, the Parthians caught up to Herod and his entourage, although Herod and his men emerged victorious in the ensuing battle.

At Herodium, Herod built one of the largest monarchical complexes in the Roman Empire, which served as a residential palace, a sanctuary, an administrative center and a mausoleum. Herod first built an artificial cone-shaped hill that could be seen from Jerusalem, on which he constructed a fortified palace surrounded by watchtowers that he used solely in wartime. At the base of the hill, he built an additional palace, which was the size of a small town and known as "Lower Herodium." The palace included many buildings, fancy gardens, pools, stables, and storage areas. Herod spared no expense in an attempt to turn the site into a regional gem, bringing water from Solomon's Pools and special soil to allow his gardens to blossom in the heart of the desert.

Following Herod's death, his son and heir Archilaus continued to reside and Herodium. After Judea became a Roman province, the site served as a center for Roman prefects.

With the outbreak of the Great Revolt, Herodium was seized by the rebels, but then handed over without resistance to the Romans following the fall of Jerusalem in 70 CE.

Fifty years later, Herodium was also used by the rebels during the Bar Kokhva revolt, but was abandoned thereafter.

In the 5th century CE, the site was settled by Byzantine monks, and then served as a leper colony before being finally abandoned in the 7th century CE.The first archeological dig at the site, between the years 1956 and 1962, was conducted by a Franciscan monk and revealed most of the currently-known remains. Israel began excavations at the site in 1972, several years after its capture during the Six-Day War.

Has the Tomb of Herod Been Found?

The location of Herod's tomb is one of the great mysteries of Biblical-era archaeology. The Herodion has long been suspected as the location. I will endeavor to find more detailed accounts of this find and post them here.

The Herodion towered in the distance (a few miles to the southeast) over Bethlehem at the time of Jesus' birth. It must have seemed an intimidating presence on the horizon. Here the tyrant perished and the King of Kings was born in its shadows...

Archaeologist finds tomb of King Herod
By MARK LAVIE, Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM - An Israeli archaeologist has found the tomb of King Herod, the legendary builder of ancient Jerusalem and the Holy Land, Hebrew University said late Monday.

The tomb is at a site called Herodium, a flattened hilltop in the Judean Desert, clearly visible from southern Jerusalem. Herod built a palace on the hill, and researchers discovered his burial site there, the university said.

The university had hoped to keep the find a secret until Tuesday, when it planned a news conference to disclose the find in detail, but the Haaretz newspaper found out about the discovery and published an article on its Web site.

Herod became the ruler of the Holy Land under the Romans around 74 B.C. The wall he built around the Old City of Jerusalem still stands, and he also ordered big construction projects in Caesaria, Jericho, the hilltop fortress of Massada and other sites.

It has long been assumed Herod was buried at Herodium, but decades of excavations had failed to turn up the site. The 1st century historian Josephus Flavius described the tomb and Herod's funeral procession.

Haaretz said the tomb was found by archaeologist Ehud Netzer, a Hebrew University professor who has been working at Herodium since 1972. The paper said the tomb was in a previously unexplored area between the two palaces Herod built on the site. Herod died in 4 B.C. in Jericho.

Herodium was one of the last strong points held by Jewish rebels fighting against the Romans, and it was conquered and destroyed by Roman troops in A.D. 71, a year after they destroyed the Second Temple in Jerusalem.

So What is a Fetus?

For those who wonder about the correctness of the Supreme Court's ruling affirming the propriety of banning "partial birth abortion", let's see what the natural outcome of pregnancy is:

Sideline Denominations (Formerly Known as Mainline Denominations)

As reported on Catholic News Service. The growing bodies are either being driven by ethnic influx (the Catholic church) or by high-demand (AG, LDS). Note that the ABCUSA remains in decline. A doctoral thesis beckons anyone tackling the role of the PSW separation and these figures.

Yearbook says U.S. Christian church membership rising
By Jerry Filteau 4/26/2007

News Service (www.catholicnews.com)

WASHINGTON, D.C. (CNS) - Total membership in U.S. Christian churches continued to rise in 2005, despite ongoing declines in some of the country's largest mainline Protestant churches, according to the 2007 Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches.

Total recorded inclusive membership in 2005 was 165,878,323, up more than 2.4 million from the previous year, the yearbook said.

The 439-page yearbook is an annual publication of the New York-based National Council of Churches. This year's book is the council's 75th edition.

It lists U.S. and Canadian church bodies, with a brief description of each and its national headquarters, officers, periodicals and major agencies or boards.

It also includes directories of U.S. and Canadian seminaries, religious periodicals, ecumenical organizations, cooperative religious organizations, institutions engaged in religious research and a selective directory of non-Christian religious organizations.

Because it relies on data collected by the church bodies, the 2007 yearbook covers 2005 data gathered by the churches in 2006. The yearbook reports what year the figures come from, since not all churches collect new data every year.

The Catholic Church remained the largest Christian church in the U.S. in 2005 with a reported membership of 69,135,254, or nearly 42 percent of all Christian church membership.
With an increase of 1.94 percent over its previous year's total, the Catholic Church was also among the fastest-growing of the nation's 25 largest churches, followed closely by the Assemblies of God, which recorded 1.86 percent growth, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with 1.63 percent growth.

In 2004 the Catholic Church came in third behind the other two in rate of growth. Because of annual fluctuations, a better indicator of trends is membership change over a longer period, such as a decade.

Between the 1997 and 2007 yearbooks, the recorded change in Catholic population was from 60.3 million to 69.1 million, or an increase of 15 percent. The Assemblies of God recorded growth of nearly 19 percent in that decade, and the Latter-day Saints grew by nearly 21 percent.

Six mainline Protestant bodies among the 25 largest churches showed losses in membership in 2005. The United Church of Christ was down 3.28 percent; the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), 2.84 percent; American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., 1.97 percent; Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, 1.62 percent; Episcopal Church, 1.59 percent; and United Methodist Church, 1.36 percent.

Three of these, the Episcopalians, Presbyterians and United Church of Christ, lost more than 10 percent of their membership between 1995 and 2005.

As in other recent years, overall seminary enrollment in the United States and Canada grew, reaching 81,302 in 2005. That was only 529 more than the previous year, however - less than the average growth of about 2,000 a year over the previous seven years. Enrollment declined slightly in Canada, from 7,036 to 6,950. In the United States it grew from 73,737 to 74,352.

Thoughts on the Virginia Tech Attack

A brief post: today the pastors of the Foothill Association of Baptist Churches (formerly part of the ABCPSW, now TransMin churches, plus one dually aligned ABC/TransMin church) met at FBC Alhambra. A large portion of our time was consumed by discussion of the Virginia Tech attack. I offer two observations on the conversation:

1. There was absolute agreement that NBC was irresponsible to air the shooter's ramblings. It served no public good and provides encouragement to other unstable homicial manics that if they do the same, they get the fame.

2. There were many observations that such crimes of violence happen daily. Someone cited the statistic that 37 people die monthly in random violence in Los Angeles (source unverified). While no one would detract that the horror of the V-Tech attack, everyday violence is a far greater problem. Sensational attacks like this smother the news that a three-year old in East LA died by random gunfire.

For a good website devoted to prayer for the V-Tech family, click here.

The Dog Bites Again

When I urged Dennis McFadden to blog, I knew that he was capable of producing a very influential blog due to his connections. His Palm Sunday blog is a good example of that. I urge you to read his April 1 entry in its entirety. Let me summarize some key points and make some of my own observations.

1. The Valley Forge execs have learned nothing by the loss of the PSW (now Transformation Ministries). They continue to grub for SOS money from the regions and other ABC related organizations. (In this case, SOS stands for Save Our Shack.)

2. Horrid theological aberrations continue to be celebrated by significant constituencies of the ABCUSA. Dennis describes a perversely named gathering of the hard left in the ABC: “Revive Us Again.” Hosted by Andover-Newton Theological School in Newton, MA, RUA was the brainchild of AWAB, the pro-homosexual ABC group. It featured my favorite theo-lefty, Bill Herzog, as well as Gregory Mobley, who contends that Satan was invented by ancient Hebrews as the trashcan in which to deposit the repellant figures of Yahweh, the God of Israel.

One way in which I differ from Dennis McFadden is that I remain an ordained American Baptist (even while my church followed PSW’s lead in withdrawing from the ABC), and I hold out hope from the reformation of the ABC. I see the key to this being the dismantling of the central directorate of the ABC, which I express as “Valley Forge delenda est!” (Check your history of the Punic Wars.) The behavior of the VF execs have done nothing to change my mind about the need to abolish the central structure. However, the gathering in Newton is the sort of thing that dents my hope for positive change in the ABC at large. Theological perversion, notes Dietrich Bonhoeffer, is ultimately more a greiveous deviation than individual moral acts.

“…John, the Faithful One”

The last installment in my Lenten series...a blessed Good Friday to all.

John 19:25-37

March 25, 2007

This week we finish looking at just a few of the faces around the cross. We’ve looked now at four people who played roles in that day. First we saw Pontius Pilate, who judged Jesus worthy of death and sent Him off to be crucified; then we looked at Peter, who denied Jesus despite being a follower for the three years leading up to the crucifixion. Last week, we examined an interesting minor character in the story: Simon of Cyrene, the man who was forced to carry Jesus’ cross the last part of the walk to Golgotha. And now we finish with the disciple John, the only disciple actually present with Jesus when He was dying on the cross.

John was the only one there. Not Peter. Not Matthew. Not Andrew. Only John. How did John overcome the natural fear that a person would have under these circumstances to stay at the side of Jesus even as He dies on the cross—and what does that say to us?

As we piece together the story from the gospels, I want to suggest three reasons why John did what he did in staying with Jesus right to death.

1. John stayed because He’d experienced Jesus as the one who can really change a life.
2. John stayed because He was compelled by love.
3. John stayed because He was appointed by God to be a witness to the crucified Jesus.

Let’s start with this admission: most people think of John as a kind of a creampuff. A really nice guy, gentle and meek and all that. That’s not really accurate. John started out as a mean-tempered nationalistic Jewish zealot.

Go to Mark 3:17. In Mark’s list of apostles, we have a curious note:

James son of Zebedee and his brother John (to them he gave the name Boanerges, which means Sons of Thunder)…

Sons of thunder? I thought they were the sons of Zebedee. Jesus gave them a nickname: “sons of thunder.” (If it were today, it’d be something like, “the thunder boys.”) Why did Jesus give them a name like that?

Well, I don’t think it was because they meek little lambs. You don’t call the guys with the sweetest disposition in the room The Thunder Boys. That’s a name you give to guys who tend to shoot first and ask questions later.

Is there any evidence of this? You bet. Check out Luke 9:51-56:

⁵¹As the time approached for him to be taken up to heaven, Jesus resolutely set out for Jerusalem. ⁵²And he sent messengers on ahead, who went into a Samaritan village to get things ready for him; ⁵³but the people there did not welcome him, because he was heading for Jerusalem. ⁵⁴When the disciples James and John saw this, they asked, "Lord, do you want us to call fire down from heaven to destroy them?" ⁵⁵But Jesus turned and rebuked them, ⁵⁶and they went to another village.

Well, isn’t that just sweet! “They weren’t nice Jesus. Can we blow em up? Please?” It was especially easy for them because they were Samaritans. Any good Jew knew that there is no such thing as a good Samaritan! Surely it’s God’s will to fry half-breed Samaritans who aren’t nice to the Messiah!

This may have been the worst behavior on the part of the Thunder Boys, but it wasn’t the only time they acted up. They were jealous of the behavior of others. They let their ambitious mom try to talk Jesus into making her boys number 2 and 3 in the kingdom of the Messiah. Yes, Jesus named them well!

But on the other hand, in spite of his weaknesses, John was dependable, prompt and courageous, faithful and devoted. He was one of three closest to Jesus. He wasn’t a cartoon: he was a real man. He had both good and not so good traits. Many of us have struggled with some of the same spiritual immaturities that John struggled with. John in his spiritual immaturity had to face up to his spiritual pride and self-centeredness. And gradually, more of the thunder side of John drops away. It’s like Jesus was chiseling away at the worse parts of him to reveal the man God always knew John could be.

Ephesians 2:10 says,

For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

Jesus had something special in mind for John from the very beginning. And Jesus has something special in mind for you as well. God wants to work in your life your whole life making you more and more like His Son in our character and especially in our love of God and love of people.

“People can’t change.” That’s an idea we Jesus-followers reject. Our whole faith is centered on the idea of redemption by the power of God expressed through the cross of Jesus and applied by the Holy Spirit. We believe people change.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11 says,

⁹Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders ¹⁰nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

(Sounds pretty bad so far, doesn’t it? But listen to this:)

That is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

The church is full of “formers.” Former sex addicts, former homosexuals (yes, I said that and meant it!), former criminals, former drunks, you name it. John was a former hothead, a former bigot (remember, he wanted to nuke the Samaritans), and a former egomaniac.

But God put him in the gem polisher and tumbled him around and wore off his rough edges so much that within a few years he’s a very different person.

Many years later, John wrote his version of the story of Jesus. He may well have been an old man by then. And he faced a dilemma: how do you modestly write a story in which you have a major part without making yourself look like a hero? His solution was ingenious. He never refers to himself by name. The only person named John in the gospel of John is John the Baptist, not John the apostle.

Instead, John refers to Himself as “the disciple that Jesus loved.” John’s identity changed from Thunder Boy to Loved-by-Jesus. Love transforms. Love changes people. John was changed.

That leads to the second reason why John stayed with Jesus even at the cross:

John stayed because He was compelled by love

One of the reasons we think of John as such a “softie” is the great emphasis on love that we find in his gospel and in the three letters that bear his name (1, 2 and 3 John). But now we see that John could be fierce. Under Jesus’ influence, he turns that into fierce loyalty. He has a love that will no be turned away.

Peter had said that even if everyone else turned away from Jesus, he wouldn’t. As we saw two weeks ago, that wasn’t a promise he could deliver on. He bailed out. Why did Peter and nine other disciples run? They were afraid. They had a reasonable fear that if they were coming for Jesus, they may come for them too.

Was John fearless? No, I’m sure he was afraid as well. Like a soldier in battle, he went ahead not because he was fearless but in spite of the fear. I’m not a veteran, I don’t know what it’s like to be under fire, but I’ve been told that you do what you have to do for your “buddy.” Love of that friend is what keeps you going.

If you go back to the meaning of “love” in Hebrew, you find a surprise. The Hebrew word ‘ahab means a bond or an alliance. It is a promise to come to your aid, no matter what. That’s what real love is: a promise to be there, no matter what.

Jesus had come alongside John and extended to him that kind of love. John had seen Jesus extend this same “no matter what, I’ll be there” kind of love to so many people: a woman caught in adultery, blind beggars, a crazed, demonized man, Mary, Martha and Lazarus; crippled people, and on and on and on. He put away his thundering and learned to love.

Is it possible to learn to love? How else can we love, expect by learning. We become what we observe and what we value. In Psalm 135:18 says about idols, “Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them.” You actually become like whatever or whoever you worship and trust.

If you trust in and worship sex, you become an animal. If you trust in and worship money, you become a consumer. If you trust in and worship power, you become an egomaniac. And if you trust in and worship Jesus Christ, you become like Him: a real Christian: a “Christ-like one.” John trusted and worshipped and loved Jesus and became like Him.

Now the third and last reason why John stayed with Jesus to the end:

John stayed because He was appointed by God to be a witness to the crucified Jesus.

Appointed by God! Let me explain.

I mentioned two weeks ago that John actually knew the High Priest, probably from business dealings. That’s how he got entrance to the room where Jesus was questioned right after his arrest. With that place established, it was far easier for John to stay nearby through Jesus’ trials right through to His crucifixion.

In John 19:25-37, John tells us about what it was like to be there when Jesus was dying on the cross. Start with vs. 25-27:

25Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. 26When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Dear woman, here is your son," 27and to the disciple, "Here is your mother." From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.

Do you think John was appointed to be there to take care of Mary? I think so.

Go on to vs. 28-30:

28Later, knowing that all was now completed, and so that the Scripture would be fulfilled, Jesus said, "I am thirsty." 29A jar of wine vinegar was there, so they soaked a sponge in it, put the sponge on a stalk of the hyssop plant, and lifted it to Jesus' lips. 30When he had received the drink, Jesus said, "It is finished." With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.

None of the other disciples were there to hear these words, “It is finished.” Jesus wasn’t saying that He was finished: He was saying that the task the Father had sent Him into the world for, to pay the price for human sin, was accomplished. Do you think that John was appointed by God to hear these words of triumph? I sure do.

Go on to vs. 31-37:

31Now it was the day of Preparation, and the next day was to be a special Sabbath. Because the Jews did not want the bodies left on the crosses during the Sabbath, they asked Pilate to have the legs broken and the bodies taken down. 32The soldiers therefore came and broke the legs of the first man who had been crucified with Jesus, and then those of the other. 33But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. 34Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus' side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water.

Pay attention now: John wants us to pay special attention:

35The man who saw it has given testimony, and his testimony is true. He knows that he tells the truth, and he testifies so that you also may believe. 36These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: "Not one of his bones will be broken,"37and, as another scripture says, "They will look on the one they have pierced."

John wants us to see some special here: blood and water flowed from Jesus’ side when His dead body was pierced by the spear. There are several possible medical reasons why a wound like this would produce a flow of blood and water. That’s only a small part of what got John’s attention. It must have been a scary sight that later struck John as full of meaning. First there’s the blood, the blood sacrifice of the Son of God, God’s own and final Passover Lamb. But after the blood comes water: the water of cleansing, the water of the Spirit, the water of a new beginning symbolized in baptism. John was appointed by God to be a witness of this post-mortem demonstration of Jesus’ mission: to die for us and to cleanse us.

John was appointed to be a witness of the cross. We also are appointed to be witnesses of the cross of Jesus. That doesn’t mean getting into a time machine and landing on the west side of Jerusalem in 30 AD. It means that we bear the marks of change and love that John bore as well.

We have been appointed to bear witness to the cross in the kind of people we are. We have been appointed to bear witness to the cross by
overcoming immaturity and self-centeredness. We have been appointed to bear witness to the cross allowing the Holy Spirit to fill us with the Love of Jesus.

John the Thunder Boy became John the Apostle of Love. John surrendered his all to Jesus. He became a different man. Jesus does that to people. He can and will do the same for you.

Simon of Cyrene : Called to Carry The Cross

March 18, 2007

Luke 23:26; Mark 15; Matthew 27

The story is often told about Jackie Robinson the first African American to play major league baseball. He faced jeering crowds in every stadium. While playing one day in his home stadium in Brooklyn, he committed an error. The fans began to ridicule him. During a delay in the game Robinson stood at second base, humiliated, his head down and began to sob. The fans jeered and threw things at him. But about that time, Brooklyn’s shortstop Pee Wee Reese, came over and stood next to him. He put his arm around Jackie Robinson and faced the crowd and as they stood there the fans grew quiet. Robinson later said, “That arm around my shoulder saved my career.”

Today I want to look at the story of a man mentioned briefly in the gospels: Simon of Cyrene. He also comes and puts an arm around Jesus. He’s the third face around the cross we’re looking at. Two weeks ago we saw Pontius Pilate, then last week was Peter and next week we’ll look at the apostle John. Simon was the man who was called to carry the cross when Jesus could no longer carry it himself. Jesus was alone and the crowds were screaming at him and jeering him. And Simon an innocent bystander put his arm around Jesus, gathered him up from the ground and helped him carry his cross.

Simon ’s role is brilliantly developed in the movie The Passion of the Christ. In the movie we see Simon putting his arm around Jesus and together they carry the cross to Golgotha. And Simon says to Jesus at one point, “Its not far, we’re almost there.”

THE STORY

Everything we know for certain about Simon is found in just three verses. In Matthew chapter 27 we see the soldiers of the Roman guard leading Jesus out of Pilate ’s palace to Golgotha where they are going to crucify him. And in verse 32 of Matthew ’s gospel, the Bible says, “As they were going out they met a man from Cyrene, named Simon, and they forced him to carry the cross.” In Luke 23:26 it says “As the led Jesus away they seized Simon of Cyrene who was on his way in from the country, and put the cross on him and made him carry it behind Jesus.”

And finally Mark 15:21 says “A certain man from Cyrene, Simon the father of Alexander and Rufus, was passing by on his way in from the country and they forced him to carry the Cross.” Mark’s readers must have known who Alexander and Rufus were, and there is a Rufus mentioned in Romans 16:13, a leader in the church in Rome. It may have been the same person.

It was customary that a man condemned to be crucified carry his own cross to the place of his crucifixion. There is something disturbing about a person having to carry the instrument of his death. It is like someone carrying the rope that is going to hang him, or someone sharpening the ax that will chop off his own head. Jesus is not allowed to have a moment of peace before his death, because the reminder of his death is, literally, on his shoulders.

THE VIA DOLOROSA

The path that Jesus walked from Pilate ’s palace to Calvary is known as the Via Dolorosa or the “way of suffering.” You can visit the Via Dolorosa today in Jerusalem where it is tradition says Jesus carried his cross. It is a narrow path, enclosed by stonewalls on both sides. The Via Dolorosa would have been crowded with people that day. Jerusalem would swell to from 40,000 to 250,000 people at Passover. The Roman soldiers would have had to separate the crowds to create a narrow path for Jesus and the criminals who would be taking this journey to the place of crucifixion.

In that crowd was Simon of Cyrene. The Bible says he had just come in from the country. He had come from Cyrene, a large city in North Africa where many Jewish people lived. Simon made the pilgrimage to the holy city during the time of the Passover to celebrate and make his sacrifice at the temple. The trip to Jerusalem would have been a long and difficult one for Simon. 855 miles by land, 57 days to walk. 35 days by camel or horse… 723 miles by sea at least 6 days of sailing, plus 1 to 2 days over land. For Simon this was perhaps a once in a lifetime journey. It might have even been a planned for years. His family was probably with him. Simon probably got lost as he entered Jerusalem. He may not have known his way around the city and got caught in pedestrian traffic. He accidentally found himself in the wrong place at the wrong time. When Simon had come to Jerusalem to celebrate Passover little did he know he would end up meeting God’s Passover Lamb!

Roman soldiers had the authority to conscript any citizen into temporary service. Simon was like a kid in the classroom who doesn’t want to be called on by his teacher. Imagine him, eyes lowered trying to be inconspicuous. But at random the soldiers seize him from the crowd and force him to carry the cross.

WHY WAS SIMON RELUCTANT?

There are a few reasons why Simon might have been reluctant to carry this cross. For one it was A FILTHY TASK. Jesus’ sweat and blood would have drenched the cross by the time Simon picked it up. Imagine the blood of Jesus running all over Simon. It was also A DIFFICULT TASK. Someone suggested that the crossbeam weighed somewhere between 200 and 300 pounds! Imagine carrying a 300 pound beam a mile or so. It was not pleasant. I am sure that Simon had a sore back after this. It was also AN EMBARRASSING TASK. Only harden criminals carried a cross. It was a sign of guilt and depravity. Simon was a law-abiding citizen and in the movie he makes it known to everyone and the Roman soldiers that he was not a criminal. It was an INCONVENIENT TASK. Simon didn’t come to Jerusalem to carry a cross. He had just spent 50 days walking to Jerusalem and he gets there and he has to lug a 300-pound cross through the streets of a strange city. This was supposed to be a memorable time for him and now he is inconvenienced by this disgusting, bloody criminal who is so disabled he can’t even walk.

CALLED TO CARRY THE CROSS

When I watched The Passion of the Christ the scene with Simon of Cyrene I was reminded of Jesus’ words in Mark 8:34-35.

If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it.

Jesus lays down a requirement for his followers. In fact, he implies that if anybody does not take his cross and follow him he is not worthy of him and cannot be his disciple. I love what John Stott says about this: “One might say, every Christian is both a Simon of Cyrene and a Barabbas. Like Barabbas we escape the cross, for Jesus died in our place. Like Simon of Cyrene we carry the cross for he calls us to take it up and follow him.”

WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO CARRY THE CROSS?

What does it mean to take up the cross? It means simply to DENY SELF. “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself.” To deny oneself means to turn away from the idolatry of self-centeredness. It means to die to self. Dietrich Bonhoeffer put it like this, “When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die.” In a real sense, Jesus calls you to a crucifixion: your crucifixion. When we follow him, we are to crucify ourselves, our desires, our possessions, our reputations. It means I no longer live for me. What I want no longer matters. When you carry a cross it is a sign that an execution is taking place: your execution.

Paul wrote in Galatians 5:24, “Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the sinful nature with its selfish passions and desires.”

WE ARE SELF CENTERED

Do you know who I have found to be some of the most self centered and selfish people in the world? Christians. I hear Christians say, “Well, I didn’t like the church service today, the music didn’t fit my taste.” “I don’t like that church, the pastor didn’t say hello to me.” “I don’t want to work with children, I want to go to worship, I need to be feed.” “I can’t believe that I wasn’t asked to sing or speak in the service. I never get asked.” “I’ve served that church as a leader for years and no one has ever thanked me. I just want to be appreciated.”

Let me ask you a thought-provoking question? Why did you come to here today? Did you come for yourself or did you come for God? Did you come to get something or give something? We even come for selfish reasons. Folks, if there is one lesson in life Jesus Christ wants to teach you is that IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU.

WHY IS IT SO HARD TO DENY SELF?

Why is it so difficult to deny self? For one is it difficult because it goes CONTRARY TO WHAT SOCIETY TEACHES. We live in a self-worshipping culture. 2 Timothy 3:1-2 says (I’m paraphrasing), "In the last days, life will very difficult. People will love only themselves and their money." It is easy to get sucked into the self-centered ways of this world.

Self-denial is also difficult because it goes contrary to our INHERENT SINFUL NATURE. We are born with an innate desire for immediate self-gratification. One of the first words a child learns is “mine.” Parents you don’t have to teach your children to be selfish. It’s ingrained, inherited from Adam. How can children be so self-centered? Aren’t they innocent? No, there is something inside all of us that gravitates to self-centeredness.

HOW TO DENY SELF?

Well how do we take up the cross of self-denial? How do we begin to release this selfish ambition we all have. Let me give you four ways.

All of us came up through school knowing that there are four things you do in math: add, subtract, multiply and divide. I think you can take those same four things and use them to grow spiritually and to learn real self-denial and God-dependence.

First, ADD. The first step in taking up your cross is…taking up your cross! The image of Simon of Cyrene is that of picking up that crossbeam. So also, when you set your face to following Jesus, there are some things to add to your life. You add worship and study and prayer and fellowship.

And as time goes on, we keep adding. You don’t stop adding. There are new disciplines to bring into our lives. Giving is a spiritual discipline designed to make us less materialist. Add that one. Add evangelism as a spiritual discipline: the planned intention of sharing your faith in Jesus with others. Add rejoicing. That’s a great spiritual discipline that makes us more God-centered as less circumstance centered.

Second SUBTRACT. Take something out of your life that serves as a barrier to spiritual growth. A lot of people have heard of “giving up something for Lent” like meat or chocolate. What’s the idea? Well, there are a lot of things that can serve as spiritual barriers. We can get addicted to all kinds of things. The first of the Ten Commandments warns us “You shall have no gods before Me.” (Exodus 20:3) Sometimes that’s easier said than done. TV, your job, your boyfriend, time spent “online” can all crowd out God.

One Biblical practice that is all about “subtract” is fasting. Fasting is a period of abstention or self-denial. We usually think of fasting in terms of food and that is it primary manifestation. But fasting teaches you to deny self. It teaches you to put your desires on the backburner. It is an exercise not in self-discipline as much as in self-denial. Fasting puts things into context: do I hunger and thirst more for God or for lunch? There is a power that comes from real Biblical fasting. The real purpose of Lenten practices is to teach Christians self-denial. It comes from a deep down yearning to deny self and remind yourself that in order to follow Christ you must take up the cross. I think Lent is a good and proper exercise for Christians as long as we don’t make it a test of spirituality.

The third is MULTIPLY. I already mentioned evangelism, but let me mention it again. God’s will is that believers be spiritually fertile. In John 15:8, Jesus says, “This is to my Father's glory, that you bear much fruit, showing yourselves to be my disciples.” He wants to be fruitful. He wants us to share our faith, to share how great and good Jesus is. Do you know what the hardest part of evangelism is? It’s crossing the room, opening your mouth. It’s that little fear of being thought foolish. My advice: just go for it! 1 Corinthians 4:10 says we’re fools for Christ anyway!

The last is DIVIDE. Divide your time and resources and give a nice chunk to God and to the needs of people. Rick Warren says, “I’m convinced that to be spiritually and emotionally healthy and balanced, that everybody needs some form of service on at least a weekly basis, where they voluntarily give themselves away without receiving any personal benefit in return.”

You have 168 hours this next week. God doesn’t want you to spend them all on yourself. The world says, "Live for you. Get all you can." And Jesus Christ says the exact opposite -- "Live for others. Give all you can." The word says, “Who wants to burden yourself with others and their problems.” Jesus says, “Bear one another’s burden.” We do that with the way we treat the poor, with the time we give, with the money we give. That “dividing” does a beautiful thing is in, and reaches into our hearts and makes us more Christlike. There is no better way to teach you self-denial than to serve and to put others ahead of your self. Isn’t that what Jesus did for you? I doubt Jesus desired to be crucified, but he denied self and went to the cross for you. Now he asks you to do the same for others.

I want to be like Simon of Cyrene. When Jesus comes along, He calls me to come alongside and calls me to help, it may be inconvenient. It may be dirty. It may hurt. It may cost me something. It may embarrass me. But I will not let Him carry it alone. Will you as well step up and carry the cross as well?

By the way, at the end of this message, we showed the video clip 'The Cross or the Crowd", which is available for download at www.imagevine.com.

“…Denied by Simon Peter”

The second installment in my Lenten series...

Mark 14:27-31, 66-72

March 11, 2007

We’re continuing this week, as we come up to Palm Sunday and Easter Sunday, to go to the events right before Jesus died. We’re looking at four people who played roles in that day. Last week we looked at Pontius Pilate, who judged Jesus worthy of death and sent Him off to be crucified; today we’ll look at Peter, who denied Jesus despite being a follower for the three years leading up to the crucifixion. Next week, we’ll examine an interesting minor character in the story: Simon of Cyrene, the man who was forced to carry Jesus’ cross the last part of the walk to Golgotha. And we’ll finish with the disciple John, the only disciple actually present with Jesus when He was dying on the cross.

Now, the reason to look at these people isn’t just to learn about them. There’s value in just that, learning about people in the Bible, but we want to do more than that. The real value is when you get a lesson or two from someone’s life. And these life lessons bring us closer and closer to Jesus. When you look at Pilate, we have a total spiritual failure. Then with Peter we have a believer who falls flat on his face but recovers. With Simon of Cyrene, we get a lesson about walking with Jesus and bearing our own cross. And then finally with John, we get a lesson in faithfulness to the end.

I have a dear friend from Puerto Rico, Victor Felix. Today he’s back in Puerto Rico, but for ten years he was the pastor of the First Spanish Baptist Church of Philadelphia. That’s in a lousy neighborhood, full of crack houses and warring gangs. Victor had a great ministry with the street toughs there. “They’re all the same,” said Victor. “Talk to them on the street, they’re all macho. Get them alone, they talk about their mamas and the fathers they never knew. It’s all peer pressure. They don’t come to Christ because they’re afraid of what the other guys will say. They don’t want to be thought of as wimps.”

You don’t have to be a street tough to think this way. We don’t want to stand out in a crowd. We don’t want to look like a fool. And the one way that will do it every time is to be labeled a religious fanatic. For many, a Christian is somebody who’s lost their mind. On one college campus, students were asked what they thought of when they heard the word “Christian.” Among the more interesting answers were “losers,” “insecure people,” and my personal favorite: “pimply-faced geeks.”

In the media, call someone a “Christian fundamentalist” and it’s like code: “This person is a crazy loon with a low IQ. You can ignore him.” Funny, the term “fundamentalist” originally meant someone who held to the fundamentals of the Christian faith, is now the longest four-letter word in American history.

Talk about appearing tough and not wanting to look like a fool, and you’re talking about the disciple Peter. This man, sometimes called the “prince of the apostles” sometimes talks and acts like, as the Brits say, a blooming idiot. So many times in the gospels we see him do and say the dumbest things. Actually, what we see him say and do are often the very same things we would have done in his place!

Let’s zero in on the night before the death of Jesus. It’s Passover Eve, AD 30. Jesus and His followers have gathered to eat the Passover. During the meal, Judas slips out to betray Jesus. When they were done there, they walk out together to the west slope of the Mount of Olives to a Garden called Gethsemane. As they walk along, they talk about many things, one in particular: Jesus says that when the moment of true testing came, they would all abandon Him. We read in Mark 14:27-31:

27"You will all fall away," Jesus told them, "for it is written:
" 'I will strike the shepherd,
and the sheep will be scattered.’

28But after I have risen, I will go ahead of you into Galilee."

29Peter declared, "Even if all fall away, I will not."

30"I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "today—yes, tonight—before the rooster crows twice you yourself will disown me three times."

31But Peter insisted emphatically, "Even if I have to die with you, I will never disown you." And all the others said the same.

And I’m sure that Peter and all the others meant it. They over-estimated themselves—something we’re all inclined to do.

Did you catch that odd thing Jesus says—“tonight, before the rooster crows twice, you’ll deny me three times.” These roosters didn’t just crow at dawn. They’re in the habit of crowing at about 12:30 AM, then 1:30 then 2:30. No, I don’t know how they tell time, they just do. The soldiers who kept watch even called this night watch “cock crow.” What Jesus is telling Peter is that before 1:30 AM that night, he would deny Jesus three times. It must have seemed completely unbelievable to Peter.

At lot can happen in a few hours. You can go from secure to fired, from healthy to struggling for life, from married to abandoned, from secure to ripped off. It doesn’t take long. And it didn’t take long this night.

They arrived at Gethsemane. Jesus goes off to pray alone, and the hours drag on. Peter and the others nod off to sleep. Then, a sudden noise and wide awake. Guards, Temple and Roman guards! Peter drew his little scabbard and cut the ear off a man named Malchus! There’s blood everywhere! Disciples run, Jesus is in chains, but Malchus—well, Jesus heals him. Peter and John flee the scene together, down toward the city. Ahead of them they see the flickering lights of the procession taking Jesus to the home of the High Priest, Caiaphas.

In John 18:15-16, John tells us that he actually knew the high priest. A good guess is that his father Zebedee had done business with Caiaphas. John was able to use that acquaintance to get entry to the room where Jesus was being questioned, and to allow Peter to stay in the courtyard.

Let’s not be too rough on Peter. At least he’s there. That’s more than could be said of the nine disciples who ran off like rabbits. Peter is tough, a strong man, but that strength works against him that night. Look at Mark 15:66-68:

66 While Peter was below in the courtyard, one of the servant girls of the high priest came by. 67 When she saw Peter warming himself, she looked closely at him. "You also were with that Nazarene, Jesus," she said. 68 But he denied it. "I don't know or understand what you're talking about," he said, and went out into the entryway.

She recognizes him, and says as much: “You were with that Nazarene.” Peter was obviously thrown, and gives her what was the formal wording for a legal denial: “I don’t know or understand what you’re talking about.” If that’s so, why does he slink back to the shadows of the entryway? Let’s count: that’s denial number one.

Now look at Mark 15:69-70a:

69When the servant girl saw him there, she said again to those standing around, "This fellow is one of them." 70Again he denied it.

The shadows don’t work; the servant girl gets chatty and tells the others, and he denies it again. Denial two.

On to vs. 70b-72:

After a little while, those standing near said to Peter, "Surely you are one of them, for you are a Galilean." 71He began to call down curses on himself, and he swore to them, "I don't know this man you're talking about." 72Immediately the rooster crowed the second time. Then Peter remembered the word Jesus had spoken to him: "Before the rooster crows twice you will disown me three times." And he broke down and wept.

The little group of servants and guards must have been talking about this odd stranger. Then it hits them: he must be one of Jesus’ men because of his Galilean accent. Cornered, Peter either can fight or run. He couldn’t physically run, so his soul went AWOL. So he swore and cursed and said, “I don’t even know this Jesus guy!” Denial three.

Here’s how I imagine it. After his little rant, there’s a moment of quiet. The only sound you hear is the crackle of the wood on the fire. In the glow of the fire, you can see Peter’s breath. Then the quiet is disturbed by the sound of a rooster’s crowing. And Peter remembers.

Luke 22:61 adds an interesting detail. At that very moment, perhaps from a window above, Jesus turned at look right at Peter. Put yourself in Peter’s place. It was an awful moment. It was the worst moment of Peter’s life.

One of the great evidences of the accuracy of the Christian faith is the way all the defects of its characters are put on display. From Abraham to Moses to David and now with Peter, you get the whole truth, even the ugly half of it. Peter’s no hero. That night he was just an ordinary guy trying to save his skin.

One lesson you can draw from this is that anybody, repeat anybody, can fall. Here he is the numero uno apostle and at the first sign of enemy shelling, he bugs out. The lesson for all of us is, “Take heed unless you also fall.”

Jeff H_____. You don’t know him, but I can’t forget him. He was the youth pastor at the church I interned at when I was in seminary. You know the TV show Everybody Loves Raymond? Well, they could have made a show called “Everybody Loves Jeff.” He was Mr. Popularity. Wherever he went, fun followed. After seminary he went from Massachusetts down to eastern Pennsylvania to pastor a small church. Something went wrong, really wrong with Jeff. One day, all on one day, Jeff resigned his church, left his wife and moved in with another woman, all on the same day. Last I heard he was working as a social working, and working on a drinking problem as well. I hope he’s turned back to the Lord, but don’t know. He cut off all his ties to his old friends. What a fall.

So there’s a warning to us all here in Peter’s story. But there’s more. Fortunately for us, we know how the story ends.

We know that Jesus was one of the first at the empty tomb of Jesus. We know that before that day was over, he would see the risen Lord.

We know that a few weeks later, Jesus sought Peter out for a special time of restoration on the shore of the Sea of Galilee. Even as Peter denied Jesus three times, Jesus gave him three times to affirm his love for the Lord.

We know that Peter was acknowledged as the leader of the apostles, and of the new church in Jerusalem. It was Peter who was the great preacher of the day of Pentecost. It was Peter who opened the door for Gentiles to become part of the Kingdom of God, and then went on to a lengthy ministry of preaching and teaching to message about Jesus in Asia Minor and finally in Rome.

And we are told in tradition that Peter at the end laid down his life as a martyr, crucified in Rome around 65 AD.

What a turnaround. Many people doing what Peter did that night would have given up and stayed away. Some would have even killed themselves like Judas did.

Maybe you’re out in the courtyard as far as God goes. You feel far from God. And you feel like you put yourself there. Maybe you did. Maybe you denied Jesus too. Maybe not so much in words but in deeds.

And you think your life is beyond repair. It’s like a car. A lot of things you can fix. But then there’s other things you can’t. Your frame is twisted and your engine is busted and your axel is twisted. You’re totaled.

I usually stay away from illustrations too long ago in history, but I’m going to break that rule and tell you a true story from American history. Many years ago in Tennessee there was a soldier. He was known for being a tough guy, the kind of guy who’d start a fight in a saloon just for the fun of it. In the army, he raided what was then Spanish territory in Florida chasing Seminole Indians. He came across some British subjects there in Florida, who he hanged just for the thrill of it.

Later, people told him that politics was almost as fun as Indian fighting, so he ran for a seat in the statehouse. Pretty soon he was the undisputed leader of his party in Tennessee, which in those days meant that you’d get a seat in the US Senate, which is what he did. And in the Senate he was a rising, star, thanks in no small part to his willingness to use the same bare-knuckled talents he’d used in war in politics.

One day he was back home in Tennessee. There was a famous evangelist back in those days by the name of Peter Cartwright. Cartwright was a rough and tumble frontier preacher who personally baptized over 12,000 converts over his long ministry. He came to a church near this Indian-fighter turned Senator’s home. Curious, the Senator decided to slip in after the singing had begun and see if this man was as good a speaker as people said.

But there was one little problem. As he came in, the pastor recognized who he was and whispered to Cartwright. Now what he whispered was a mistake. He said that in view of their honored guest, he ought to be careful that he didn’t say anything to offend him. Big mistake. That was like saying, “Sic ‘em!” to a dog.

Cartwright got up to speak, and was preaching the message about Jesus and how we need to turn our lives over to him. Everybody, he said, needs Jesus. And about halfway through his message he said,

I understand that there is a US Senator among those present today. And if he does not repent of his sins and accept Jesus Christ as his Savior and Lord, he will just as lost and anyone else who has never asked God for forgiveness.

A hush fell over the congregation. Some expected him to storm out in anger. Instead, he admired Cartwright’s boldness and conviction. A burning was set afire in his heart. He thought of all the mean and violent things he’d done over the years, and he felt drawn to Jesus as never before. A few days later, he invited Peter Cartwright to his home, where he and his wife gave their lives to Jesus Christ. And he and Cartwright became fast friends. So much so, that Peter Cartwright was invited to the inaugural of that man, Andrew Jackson, when he was elected president of the United States.

Andrew Jackson knew that day what Peter learned from Jesus first hand when the Lord rose from the dead. There is no valley too wide for God’s love to cross—no life too wicked, no deed so terrible that God can’t reach across and make it right through the death of His Son on the cross.

So there’s no need to stay in the shadows. Let His light do its work. Come home to the love of God. That’s God’s invitation to you today.

“…Suffered Under Pontius Pilate”

For Holy Week, I will post four messages I shared over the last few weeks. We start with a message about Pilate.

Mark 15:1-15

March 4, 2007

Over the next four weeks, as we come up to Palm Sunday and Easter Sunday, I want to take you to the day Jesus died. We’re going to be looking at four people who played roles in that day. Those four are Pontius Pilate, who judged Jesus worthy of death and sent Him off to be crucified; then we’ll look at Peter, who denied Jesus despite being a follower for the three years leading up to the crucifixion. Then we’ll examine an interesting minor character in the story: Simon of Cyrene, the man who was forced to carry Jesus’ cross the last part of the walk to Golgotha. And we’ll finish with the disciple John, the only disciple actually present with Jesus when He was dying on the cross.

Now, the reason to look at these people isn’t just to learn about them. There’s value in just that, learning about people in the Bible, but we want to do more than that. The real value is when you get a lesson from someone’s life. And these life lessons bring us closer and closer to Jesus. When you look at Pilate, we have a total spiritual failure. Then with Peter, a believer who falls flat on his face but recovers. With Simon of Cyrene, we get a lesson about walking with Jesus and bearing our own cross. And then finally with John, we get a lesson in faithfulness to the end.

I want to start today with Pontius Pilate. Pilate was a spiritual disaster. And at the heart of Pilate’s disaster is that he was a coward. There’s no sin in being afraid, but it is a sin to be a spiritual coward. And that’s what Pilate was, a spiritual coward.

Let’s look at his life. Pilate hated his assignment as Roman governor of Judea. He never understood the Jews and certainly that he never understood Jesus.

It’s ironic that his name is remembered in the Apostles’ Creed, an ancient creed that millions of Christians around the world recite as an affirmation of their faith. Part of that creed reads:

I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord. He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary. He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended to the dead. On the third day he rose again.

“He suffered under Pontius Pilate.” That’s the legacy of Pilate: He made Jesus suffer on the cross. Who is this man Pilate? And why do I call him a coward?

We can piece together a lot from sources outside the Bible. He came from a prominent Roman family, one that had many men who had military careers and had served in public office. We know he was posted to Judea in 26 AD. We also know he was an awful governor.

The Jews were unusual people as far as the Romans were concerned. They were fanatic about their God—a God no one could see. There were no statues of the God of Israel, and that seemed very odd to the Romans. Instead, the Temple at Jerusalem was the focus of their faith. Festivals of sacrifice—especially Passover—were at the center of Jewish religion.

To people like Pilate, the Jews were unreasonably exclusive. Here he was, the governor of Judea, but even he could not approach the Temple. Instead, well outside the temple there was a fence with a sigh warning any Gentile that if they got closer, they would be put to death. Few ever dared to test this.

Pilate showed complete insensitivity to Jewish scruples. Previous Roman governors declined to set up Roman standards in Jerusalem because of the Roman gods depicted on the standards. Pilate did, to the protest of all, especially the Jewish Council of Elders, the Sanhedrin. Reluctantly, he backed down. But he retaliated by setting up golden shields at the fortress in Jerusalem and minting coins with the same symbols. Again, there was protests and after a time, he backed down again.

So he set his mind to a practical problem: water for Jerusalem. An aqueduct was needed, and the temple treasury was running a huge surplus. He appropriated the money needed, then, you guessed it, the people protested that “holy money” was being used for secular purposes—and by a Roman! But this time, Pilate didn’t back down. An angry mob of protesters, mostly from Galilee, gathered in the outer courtyard of the Temple. Pilate ordered his soldiers to crush what he saw as a rebellion. Many died that day. And many influential members of the Sanhedrin wrote Caesar asking that Pilate be fired.

That was the situation Pilate was in when Jesus came before him. He felt his governorship was hanging by a thread and he saw the case of Jesus as nothing but trouble. Compared to some other matters that had come before Him, Jesus was a minor nuisance. But he was determined not to bungle this case.

What did he know about Jesus before that day? He must have known some things. He must have known that He was a popular traveling teacher from Galilee. He must have known that He was an opponent of the hypocrites who ran the Temple and who dominated the Sanhedrin. He must have known that some considered Him the Messiah.

The messiah thing was the most troubling part about Jesus. For the Jews of Judea and Galilee, the Messiah was expected to be a warrior king who would reestablish the throne of David. Pilate’s predecessors had dealt with two so-called Messiahs, and his successors would deal with two more.

But Jesus was different from all the others: no one had ever seen Him even hold a sword. Instead, all reports spoke of Him teaching the crowds and of miraculous healings. This Jesus was impressive, but He seemed to be only interested in religious things—things Pilate didn’t understand or even care to learn about.

But everything changed on Thursday night, the night before Passover. Sometime that evening, a message came from the Sanhedrin: we intend to arrest Jesus and bring Him before you tomorrow morning for capital crimes. Do we have your support? Pilate saw this as an opportunity to get on the good side of the Sanhedrin. Pilate told them to proceed.

How do we know that Pilate was informed at this point? There are two clues found in the gospels. First, Jesus delayed a long, long time in the Garden of Gethsemane. That can best be explained by the fact that it took time for Judas to go the leaders of the Sanhedrin, for them to decide to act, for a messenger to get the message to Pilate and wait for his answer, and them to send out the “temple police”, a Jewish contingent of soldiers. Also, John 18:3 implies that there were Roman soldiers involved in the arrest party as well. All this would have take a few hours to put together.

The second clue that Pilate had been informed on Thursday night is found in Matthew 27:19. We’re told of a message that came to Pilate from his wife in the midst of Jesus’ trial:

While Pilate was sitting on the judge's seat, his wife sent him this message: "Don't have anything to do with that innocent man, for I have suffered a great deal today in a dream because of him."

By the way, we know her name: Claudia Procula. Again, this makes the most sense if Pilate had decided to go along with the Sanhedrin, ordered a detachment of soldiers to go with the messenger, and then went back to his living quarters and mentioned what was going on to Claudia.

Now, Friday morning comes. Jesus has been found guilty of blasphemy by a hastily called meeting of the Sanhedrin in the middle of the night. Now He’s transferred over to Pilate on charges that the Romans cared about: rebellion and claiming to be king. Look in Mark 15:1-5:

¹Very early in the morning, the chief priests, with the elders, the teachers of the law and the whole Sanhedrin, reached a decision. They bound Jesus, led him away and handed him over to Pilate.

²"Are you the king of the Jews?" asked Pilate.

"Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied.

³The chief priests accused him of many things. ⁴So again Pilate asked him, "Aren't you going to answer? See how many things they are accusing you of."

⁵But Jesus still made no reply, and Pilate was amazed.

“Pilate was amazed.” Actually meeting Jesus surprised Pilate. Jesus said so little in His defense—it was if He was stupid or crazy—or if He wanted to die.

The one time He answers Pilate in this passage is when Pilate asked Him directly, “Are you the King of the Jews?”

And Jesus’ answer is literally, “You say.” Just two words in Greek: Su legeis. The NIV translates His words as “Yes, it is as you say,” which is a little different. Actually, Jesus was being a little guarded about His answer. Here’s why: Pilate saw being “King of the Jews” as being a political rebel against Rome. Jesus saw being “King of the Jews” as being God’s Messiah. So His answer kind of splits the difference, as if He were saying, “Well, yes, but what I mean by ‘King of the Jews’ and what you mean isn’t the same.”

Other than that, Jesus is pretty much silent, something foretold hundreds of years before in Isaiah 53:7:

He was oppressed and afflicted,

yet he did not open his mouth;

He was led like a lamb to the slaughter,

and as a sheep before her shearers is silent,

so he did not open his mouth.

Pilate does all the talking; Jesus is silent. He is silent because of His confidence in the plan of His Heavenly Father. He knows there is no way forward that does not include the cross.

The cross lies at the center of the plan of God. He must die on the cross. He must pay the price for forgiveness there. Only the God-Man, Jesus Christ, fully God and fully man can pay the price. Only God is pure enough to pay that price; only a man can die for the sins of mankind. The cross is a necessity. You can’t get around it.

Of course, Pilate couldn’t even imagine anything like this. He must have seemed to Pilate to be the strangest rabbi in Israel. But the issue for Pilate wasn’t one of truth or justice: it was, “How do I take care of the Jesus case in a way that doesn’t hurt my standing with Rome?” He didn’t need another embarrassment.

That’s when a possible solution presented itself. You can read about it in Mark 15:6-14:

⁶Now it was the custom at the Feast to release a prisoner whom the people requested. ⁷A man called Barabbas was in prison with the insurrectionists who had committed murder in the uprising. ⁸The crowd came up and asked Pilate to do for them what he usually did.

⁹"Do you want me to release to you the king of the Jews?" asked Pilate, ¹⁰knowing it was out of envy that the chief priests had handed Jesus over to him. ¹¹But the chief priests stirred up the crowd to have Pilate release Barabbas instead.

¹²"What shall I do, then, with the one you call the king of the Jews?" Pilate asked them.

¹³"Crucify him!" they shouted.

¹⁴"Why? What crime has he committed?" asked Pilate.

But they shouted all the louder, "Crucify him!"

Here’s a possible solution: a custom of releasing a prisoner at Passover. Pilate didn’t want to acquit Jesus and throw the Sanhedrin into a rage; on the other hand, he really didn’t want to find Him guilty, because He really seemed harmless. Plus, there was that dream his wife had. Remember? I mentioned that earlier. It’s recorded in Matthew 27:19. She sent this message:

"Don't have anything to do with that innocent man, for I have suffered a great deal today in a dream because of him."

Romans were very, very superstitious. There looked at dreams, weather, cloud formations, even the spatter from a wine glass as omens and signs. But dreams were taken very seriously. Pilate must have been sweating when he finished reading that note from Claudia.

So Pilate tries to get out of the jam by offering the people a choice between a thug named Barabbas and the Rabbi from Galilee, Jesus. He thought it would be an easy way out. They call out for Barabbas. And more than that. We read in John 19:12, someone called out, “If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar. Anyone who claims to be a king opposes Caesar.”

That was Pilate’s “tipping point.” His whole career—even his whole life—depended on being a “friend of Caesar.” Being a “friend of Caesar” meant being part of the circle of advisors and administrators around Emperor Caesar Tiberius. The very idea of losing that status was too much. You can almost hear Pilate thinking: “Let the Galilean die! My career is more important than this Jesus.”

Look at vs. 15:

Wanting to satisfy the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas to them. He had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified.

Pilate was a coward. It was fear that made him put Jesus to death. Yes, he made a big show of washing his hands, putting all the blame on the crowd, but there’s no getting around the fact that Jesus died on a Roman cross at the hands of Roman soldiers and under the direction of him, the Roman governor.

I want us to think about fear for a minute. Fear is the thing that unites us to Pilate. We all have our fears. Pilate had Jesus crucified because of his fear of losing his status.

There’s a passage over in Revelation 21:8 that I didn’t understand for many years. It says that the cowardly will end up in the lake of fire—what the Book of Revelation calls hell. The reason I didn’t understand it is that while I always knew that being a coward wasn’t a good thing, it never seemed bad enough to get a special mention on a person’s ticket to hell!

It took getting really involved in evangelism for me to understand what the big deal about cowardice was. The reality is that it’s fear that keeps a lot of people away from Jesus. Not fear of Jesus. Fear about what people will think, or fear of what they think that they might be losing.

And there’s a difference between having fear and being a coward. In battle, everybody’s afraid. The only people who aren’t afraid are crazy. You change from being afraid to being a coward when you surrender to your fears and let them take over. Pilate changed from being afraid to being a coward when he sent Jesus to die.

Today, you may have fears about being a follower of Christ. You’re afraid of being labeled a religious freak. You’re afraid of the cost, and there is a cost. You’re afraid of the lifestyle changes that will demand. And you’re right; following Him involves a new way of life. You’re afraid of the weird people you’d be identifying with. I understand that fear. I remember back in 1971 when I was on the verge of following Him. My intellectual objections held me back, but they were being answered one by one. But as I thought of what that would mean—remember I was a teenager at the time—all I could think of was the fact that whenever I went by a church it seemed to be full of old wrinkly people who smelled funny. (Sorry, that’s what I thought!) I was afraid of being identified with them. I wanted to be with, you know, cool people.

But it was Jesus Himself that drew me in, and then, guess what? I found that the coolest people in the world were the ones following Him!

Today is a good day to say no to your fears and to say yes to your faith, to say yes to Jesus. Pilate collapsed and gave into fear and is remembered for that for all time. The Bible says, “The perfect love of God drives out fear” (1 John 4:18). You don’t have to do be fearful. Put your trust in Jesus today. He will never ever disappoint you. You can have confidence in Him. Today’s the day!

PRAYER
END